ConnectMyAssets
vs Auvik
Cloud network monitoring and visibility. Compare the scope your team needs, the architecture and the operations you want to simplify.
- Multi-vendor
- Modules included
- Deployed on your infrastructure
A shared view of assets for network, security and compliance teams.
Click the screenshot to enlargeWhat you are really comparing.
Scope
AuvikAuvik combines discovery, mapping, monitoring, alerts and configuration backup in a cloud platform.
ConnectMyAssetsInventory, backup, compliance, firewalls, IPAM, SSH access and automation in one platform.
Operations
AuvikPerformance and traffic visibility, Syslog collection and multi-site management.
ConnectMyAssetsSoron alerts, firmware tracking and EoL/EoS management connected to device context.
Deployment
AuvikCloud platform fed by collectors installed at your sites.
ConnectMyAssetsAn appliance on your infrastructure. Data and configurations remain within your perimeter.
Competitor scope source: official documentation Auvik ↗
Start with your workflows.
A key choice is cloud delivery versus hosting within your perimeter. If performance monitoring is central, compare the metrics you require during a demonstration.
Why evaluate ConnectMyAssets?
- Unify network operations with asset context.
- Give infrastructure, security and compliance teams a shared view.
- Keep data on your infrastructure with all modules included.
All your network needs, connected.
Inventory, operations, security and management visibility: explore every platform module.
Prepare your decision.
How should you choose between ConnectMyAssets and Auvik?
A key choice is cloud delivery versus hosting within your perimeter. If performance monitoring is central, compare the metrics you require during a demonstration.
How should you prepare a migration?
Inventory the devices, backups, policies and integrations you need to retain. Test a pilot scope with limited permissions, then validate collection, checks and restoration before extending deployment.
How should you compare costs?
Request quotes for equivalent scope: devices, sites, modules, support and duration. Include installation, integration and maintenance effort. Licence pricing alone does not describe total cost.